Ads 468x60px


Showing posts with label violation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label violation. Show all posts

Thursday, June 30, 2011

Russia: arming Libya rebels is "crude violation" (Reuters)

TRIPOLI (Reuters) – Russia accused France on Thursday of committing a "crude violation" of a U.N. weapons embargo by arming Libyan rebels, a stance which could also cause unease within the Western alliance bombing to remove Muammar Gaddafi.

France confirmed on Wednesday that it had air-dropped arms to rebels in Libya's Western Mountains, becoming the first NATO country to openly acknowledge arming the insurgency against Gaddafi's 41-year rule.

France, Britain and the United States are leading a three-month-old air campaign which they say they will not end until Gaddafi falls. The war has become the bloodiest of the "Arab Spring" uprisings sweeping North Africa and the Middle East.

Rebel advances have been slow, although the insurgents claimed successes this week in the Western Mountains region where they received the French arms, pushing on Sunday to within 80 km (50 miles) of Tripoli, Gaddafi's main stronghold.

"We asked our French colleagues today whether reports that weapons from France were delivered to Libyan rebels correspond with reality," Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said.

"If this is confirmed, it is a very crude violation of U.N. Security Council Resolution 1970," he said. That resolution, adopted in February, imposed a comprehensive arms embargo on Libya.

Paris said on Wednesday it believed it had not violated the U.N. embargo because the weapons it gave the rebels were needed to protect civilians from an imminent attack, which it says is allowed under a later Security Council resolution.

Although Russia is not involved in the bombing campaign, its stance could add to reservations among some NATO countries wary over an air war that has lasted longer and cost more than expected. Moscow could also challenge Paris at the U.N. Security Council, where both are veto-wielding permanent members.

France's weapons airlift, while possibly increasing the insurgent threat to Gaddafi, highlights a dilemma for NATO.

More than 90 days into its bombing campaign, Gaddafi is still in power and no breakthrough is in sight, making some NATO members feel they should help the rebels more pro-actively, something the poorly armed insurgents have encouraged.

But if they do that, they risk fracturing the cohesion of the international coalition because of differences over how far to go in trying to topple Gaddafi.

Even before news of the French arms supply emerged, fissures were emerging in the coalition with some members voicing frustration about the high cost, civilian casualties, and the elusiveness of a military victory.

Gaddafi says the NATO campaign is an act of colonial aggression aimed at stealing the North African state's oil. He says NATO's U.N.-mandated justification for its campaign -- to protect Libyan civilians from attack -- is spurious.

FRANCE ACTS ALONE

NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen made clear on Thursday the weapons airlift was a unilateral French initiative. Asked by reporters on a visit to Vienna if NATO had been involved, he answered: "No."

"As regards compliance with the U.N. Security Council resolution, it is for the U.N. sanctions committee to determine that," Rasmussen said.

The rebels are pushing toward Tripoli from the mountains to the southwest and from the coast to the east, where they have made scant progress advancing from their stronghold of Misrata.

In Misrata, about 200 km (130 miles) east of Tripoli, which has been bombarded for months by Gaddafi's security forces, six rockets landed early on Thursday near the oil refinery and port.

A Reuters journalist in Misrata reported no casualties.

Britain's military said its Apache helicopters had attacked a government checkpoint and two military vehicles near Khoms, on the Mediterranean coast between Misrata and Tripoli.

Insurgents say Gaddafi's forces are massing and bringing weapons to quell an uprising in Zlitan, the next big town along the road from Misrata to the capital. Rebels inside Zlitan said they mounted a raid on pro-Gaddafi positions on Wednesday night.

"(We) carried out a violent attack last night on checkpoints ... and exchanged gunfire, killing a number of soldiers," a rebel spokesman, who identified himself as Mabrouk, told Reuters from the town.

WEAPONS DROP

Le Figaro newspaper said France had parachuted rocket launchers, assault rifles and anti-tank missiles into the Western Mountains region, southwest of Tripoli, in early June.

A French military spokesman later confirmed arms had been delivered, although he said anti-tank missiles were not among them. Despite the diplomatic storm, the rebels encouraged more arms deliveries.

"Giving (us) weapons we will be able to decide the battle more quickly, so that we can shed as little blood as possible," senior rebel figure Mahmoud Jibril told a news conference in Vienna.

The conflict has halted oil exports from Libya, helping push up world oil prices to near $112 per barrel.

Jibril said it may take years for oil exports to fully resume: "No, no oil is being sold. A lot of the oil well system was destroyed, especially in the east."

Misrata's rebels have pushed westwards out of the city but are blocked by government troops in Zlitan. In the eastern third of the country, rebel forces have been unable to advance west to the oil town of Brega.

Rebels in the Western Mountains advanced 30 km (19 miles) north toward Tripoli last week, but have since been held down by pro-Gaddafi forces around the town of Bir al-Ghanam, about 80 km short of the capital.

Nalut, a Western Mountains town near the border with Tunisia, came under artillery fire from pro-Gaddafi forces overnight, a rebel spokesman called Mohamed told Reuters.

"Two (rockets) hit the town center while the rest landed on farmland surrounding the town," he said.

(Additional reporting by Hamid Ould Ahmed in Algiers, Maria Tsvetkova in Moscow, Fredrik Dahl and Michael Shields in Vienna, Chris Buckley in Beijing and London bureau; Writing by Christian Lowe; Editing by Peter Graff)


Yahoo! News

Saturday, April 23, 2011

Lindsay Lohan faces 4 months jail time for probation violation

Lindsay Lohan was bailed out of jail Friday after she was sentenced for violating her probation.NEW: Lohan leaves jail after 5 hours in custody Friday eveningShe posted a $75,000 bond while she appeals the jail sentenceThe judge sentences Lohan to 120 days in jail for a probation violationLohan's theft charge is reduced from a felony to a misdemeanor

Los Angeles (CNN) -- Lindsay Lohan, accused of stealing a necklace, spent five hours in custody before posting a $75,000 bond Friday evening after a judge sentenced her to 120 days in jail for violating her drunk driving probation.

Her release from Los Angeles County's Lynwood Correctional Facility capped a long day that included a victory for the actress when a judge reduced the felony grand theft charge to a misdemeanor.

Lohan will remain free on bond while her lawyer appeals the jail sentence for the probation violation, but she must immediately start serving 480 hours of community service, Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Stephanie Sautner said.

The community service, includes 360 hours at a downtown Los Angeles women's center, which Judge Sautner suggested might cause Lohan to behave better after seeing "how truly needy women and women who have fallen on real hard times have to live."

var currExpandable = "expand14";if(typeof CNN.expandableMap === 'object') {CNN.expandableMap.push(currExpandable);}var currExpandableHeight = 360;mediaObj.lgImage= $(currExpandable).select('img.box-image')[0].readAttribute('src');mediaObj.lgImageX = 640;mediaObj.lgImageY = currExpandableHeight;mediaObj.origImageX = $(currExpandable).select('img.box-image')[0].readAttribute('width'); mediaObj.origImageY = $(currExpandable).select('img.box-image')[0].readAttribute('height');mediaObj.contentType = 'Video';CNN.expElements.expand14Store = mediaObj;var currExpandable = "expand24";if(typeof CNN.expandableMap === 'object') {CNN.expandableMap.push(currExpandable);}var currExpandableHeight = 360;mediaObj.lgImage= $(currExpandable).select('img.box-image')[0].readAttribute('src');mediaObj.lgImageX = 640;mediaObj.lgImageY = currExpandableHeight;mediaObj.origImageX = $(currExpandable).select('img.box-image')[0].readAttribute('width'); mediaObj.origImageY = $(currExpandable).select('img.box-image')[0].readAttribute('height');mediaObj.contentType = 'Video';CNN.expElements.expand24Store = mediaObj;var currExpandable = "expand34";if(typeof CNN.expandableMap === 'object') {CNN.expandableMap.push(currExpandable);}var currExpandableHeight = 360;mediaObj.lgImage= $(currExpandable).select('img.box-image')[0].readAttribute('src');mediaObj.lgImageX = 640;mediaObj.lgImageY = currExpandableHeight;mediaObj.origImageX = $(currExpandable).select('img.box-image')[0].readAttribute('width'); mediaObj.origImageY = $(currExpandable).select('img.box-image')[0].readAttribute('height');mediaObj.contentType = 'Video';CNN.expElements.expand34Store = mediaObj;

She must complete another 120 hours of community service at the Los Angeles County morgue.

The judge ruled Friday that the necklace theft case against Lohan will go forward to trial, but the felony charge was reduced to a misdemeanor.

"I'm going to give her an opportunity," Sautner said.

Sautner did not buy the defense argument that Lohan accidentally walked out of a Venice, California, jewelry store wearing a necklace that later appeared around her neck in photographs taken five days later.

"If in fact it was an accident, she could have called the store back," Sautner said.

People.com: Judge scolds Lohan

Defense attorney Shawn Holley argued that Lohan was busy and scattered when she was at the store and absent-mindedly walked out with the necklace.

"It's undisputed that Ms. Lohan walked out of the store with the necklace on," Holley said. The prosecution must show she had "specific intent to permanently deprive the store of that necklace."

While Holley conceded that Lohan "did not rush to return the necklace," but it just "makes her not a very considerate or courteous person."

"The fact that she may not have been a courteous or considerate person doesn't make her a thief," Holley said.

"I see the intent here and the level of brazenness to say 'Let me see what I can get away with here,' " Sautner said.

A police detective testified that Lohan's assistant handed the necklace to a police officer after learning through a website posting that police had obtained a search warrant hours earlier to search for it in her home.

Prosecutor Danette Meyers argued that "it doesn't take a rocket scientist" to realize Lohan returned the necklace to police because she knew her home was about to be searched.

Lohan's trial date was set for June 3, but she must return to court for a hearing May 11, the judge said.

A misdemeanor could still result in up to a year in prison for Lohan.

Before delivering the good news to Lohan about the reduction of the charge, the judge addressed her much-publicized misbehavior.

"She thumbs her nose at the court," Sautner said, referring to an incident with another judge last year. "She walks into court with 'F U' on her fingernails. I don't know what that means unless it has 'I am' before it."

The jeweler who accused Lohan of stealing the gold and diamond necklace testified Friday that she had not gotten any money from selling the security camera video of the actress in her store.

Kamofie and Company owner Sofia Kamen was the second witness called by the prosecution in the preliminary hearing.

Holley used the the store's licensing of the video, for a reported $40,000, to question Kamen's motives in accusing Lohan of theft.

All of the money from the video licensing went to publicist Christopher Spencer, who Kamen said she fired last month because he was negotiating deals for the store that she was not interested in, she testified.

Kamen said that she realized the necklace was missing 10 minutes after the actress left the store last January.

She wasn't closely watching Lohan, even though there was another incident four days earlier in which the actress almost walked out wearing a diamond earring.

"We thought it was an accident," Kamen said. "We weren't thinking that she would take it."

The first prosecution witness was Tinelli Comsooksri, a store employee who was working the day of the earring incident.

"She was covering the earring that she still left on with her hair," Comsooksri said. She stopped Lohan as she was walking out, Comsooksri said.

As prosecutor Meyers held the infamous necklace, now known as "People's Exhibit 2," Kamen testified that it was priced at $2,500 although it cost the store only $850. She explained that retail jewelers routinely triple the wholesale price.

The value of the necklace was a crucial issue for Lohan for the felony grand theft charge to be reduced to a misdemeanor. Shoplifting offenses are charged as petty theft if the property taken is valued at less than $950.

Lohan has been in court nine times in the past year, mostly for hearings related to probation violations for her 2007 drunk driving case.

She did a short stint in jail last year, but she also checked into substance abuse rehab twice under court order.


View the original article here


This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

Saturday, April 2, 2011

Yale probed for alleged Title IX violation

Yale under federal investigation for alleged Title IX violation From Jordana Ossad, CNN STORY HIGHLIGHTSYale is under investigation for claims school policies permitted a "sexually hostile environment"The complaint says the school has an insufficient process for addressing Title IXYale says it cannot respond to the accusations because it has not yet received the complaintThe university says, "Yale takes extremely seriously all allegations of sexual harassment" (CNN) -- Yale University is under federal investigation after a complaint was filed that claims it's policies have allowed a "sexually hostile environment" to exist on campus, officials said.

The complaint blames the prestigious university for failing to adequately respond to alleged incidents of harassment, U.S. Department of Education spokesman Jim Bradshaw quoted the complaint Friday as saying.

The school is accused of providing an insufficient grievance process for addressing the federal gender-equity law, Title IX, which allegedly resulted in "the denial of equal opportunity to education for numerous university students," he said.

Yale spokesman Thomas Conroy told CNN that the university cannot respond to the accusations because it has not yet received the formal complaint.

"We will respond fully to the investigation, and cooperate with the (Department of Education) Office of Civil Rights," Conroy said.

He added, "Yale takes extremely seriously all allegations of sexual harassment and sexual misconduct, including allegations of a 'hostile environment.'"

The investigation comes on the heels of a controversial YouTube video released in October that revealed chants encouraging rape, allegedly being expressed by Delta Kappa Epsilon fraternity's new recruits as they marched through the Yale campus in New Haven, Connecticut.

In a statement by the board of directors of Delta Kappa Epsilon, the international fraternity said it strongly condemns the actions of the Yale chapter and acknowledges that the sentiments expressed were offensive.

The complaint also follows reports of a party in which undergraduate students were allegedly asked to strip naked.



View the Original article