File photo by Alan Kim, The Roanoke Times, via AP
Injured individuals are carried out of Norris Hall at Virginia Tech on April 16, 2007. Seung Hui Cho killed 32 people and himself.
EnlargeCloseFile photo by Alan Kim, The Roanoke Times, via AP
Injured individuals are carried out of Norris Hall at Virginia Tech on April 16, 2007. Seung Hui Cho killed 32 people and himself.
The failure warrants a fine "far in excess" of that, a letter notifying the university said, but $27,500 per violation was the most allowed by law. The university also was cited for failing to follow its own security policy, required by law, on crime warnings.The department cited the school for violations of the Clery Act, which requires schools that receive federal aid to issue a "timely warning" when a serious crime is committed on campus. The law is named for Jeanne Clery, a Lehigh University freshman murdered in her dorm room in 1986.Virginia Tech said in a written statement it will appeal. "Neither the Department of Education nor the Clery Act defines 'timely,' " the statement said. "The university actions on April 16 were well within the standards and practices in effect at that time."A survivor of the shootings, Virginia Tech graduate Colin Goddard, applauded the fine."I think what's important is it was the maximum they could fine," said Goddard, 25, who was shot four times by Virginia Tech student Seung Hui Cho. He is assistant director of federal legislation with the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence. "It's not a surprise. I knew that the school had acted too slowly four years ago."At about 7:15 a.m. on the day of the rampage, Cho fatally shot two students in a residence hall. At 9:26 a.m., school administrators e-mailed students and staff to say there had been a shooting; the e-mail did not say the killer had not been identified.Between 9:40 a.m. and 9:51 a.m., Cho shot 47 more people in Norris Hall, then fatally shot himself.The Education Department letter says students and staff continued to move freely around campus, unaware of the danger."The facts that the assailant had not been identified, a weapon had not been found at the scene and that bloody footprints led away from the bodies strongly indicated that the shooter was still at large, and posed an ongoing threat," Education official Mary Gust wrote.After the first shooting and before the warning, she said, two senior administrators e-mailed their families, bank deposit pickups and campus trash pickup were canceled, and Blacksburg public schools were locked down.Virginia Tech said that its own guidelines at the time of the shootings said 48 hours would be an acceptable time frame in which to inform a campus of a serious crime. The school complained it is being held accountable for a standard adopted after its own tragedy.A representative of Security on Campus, an organization launched by the Clery family, disputed that."All the provisions that they were found to have violated had been part of the original statute enacted in 1990," S. Daniel Carter said.He said the case has broader national policy implications."It sends a very important message to other colleges and universities that their timely warning policies have to be taken seriously," he said.
For more information about reprints & permissions, visit our FAQ's. To report corrections and clarifications, contact Standards Editor Brent Jones. For publication consideration in the newspaper, send comments to letters
View the
Original article
