Ads 468x60px


Showing posts with label propose. Show all posts
Showing posts with label propose. Show all posts

Monday, May 2, 2011

Four agencies propose strict health limits on marketing food to kids

WASHINGTON — Commercials promoting sugary breakfast cereals could be put on a strict diet under proposed government guidelines urging food companies to limit marketing of unhealthy products to children.



Cafeteria workers prepare lunches at the Normandie Avenue Elementary School in South Central Los Angeles in this file photo.

By Mark Ralston, AFP/Getty Images


Cafeteria workers prepare lunches at the Normandie Avenue Elementary School in South Central Los Angeles in this file photo.

Under a proposal announced Thursday by several government agencies, companies would be urged to only market foods to children ages 2 through 17 if they are low in fats, sugars and sodium and contain specified healthy ingredients.

Specifically, the agencies recommend that companies only market foods that have a significant amount of fruits, vegetables, whole grains, low-fat milk products, fish, extra lean meat, eggs, nuts, seeds or beans. Foods that have any trans-fat, more than 1 gram of saturated fat, more than 13 grams of added sugars or more than 210 milligrams of sodium in a serving would not be eligible for marketing to children.

The agencies suggest the industry focus its efforts on foods that are most heavily marketed to children, including breakfast cereals, carbonated beverages, restaurant foods and snack foods.

The guidelines set parameters that are stricter than many companies have set for themselves and, if the companies agree, would eliminate much of the advertising consumers see now ? on television, in magazines, in stores and on the Internet ? for foods that appeal to children.

If many companies sign on to the guidelines, children could see much less of the colorful cartoon characters used to advertise cereals or other gimmicks designed to draw their attention. If the companies want to continue that advertising, they would have to reduce unhealthy ingredients in their products.

The food industry has been successful in reducing the number of television ads aimed at children in recent years, and much of that advertising has moved to the Internet, social media and other digital platforms such as smart phones. Public health advocates have argued that the industry's self-regulation is not enough and has pushed the government to set guidelines.

In 2009, Congress directed the Federal Trade Commission, Agriculture Department, Food and Drug Administration and the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to form a working group and develop the recommendations. The guidelines they wrote are broad, applying to almost any promotion a child might see for a food ? including text messages, product placement in video games and celebrity endorsements.

The agencies said the proposal, which would be phased in over five years and is open for public comment until the summer, is "to encourage a marketing environment that supports, rather than undermines," parents' efforts to get children to eat healthy food.

"While the goals (the guidelines) would set for food marketers are ambitious and would take time to put into place, the public health stakes could not be higher," the working group said in a statement. "One in three children is overweight or obese, and the rates are even higher among some racial and ethnic groups."

Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa, who authored the original bill asking for the guidelines, said Wednesday he is pleased with the agencies' recommendations.

"Kids are being bombarded daily with ads for unhealthy foods and it is long past time that we limit the amount of junk food advertising," he said.

It is unclear whether government pressure will be effective enough to get many companies to sign on. Some of the country's largest food companies, including McDonalds, General Mills, Kellogg, Kraft Foods Global and PepsiCo, already have joined an initiative sponsored by the Better Business Bureau to limit their marketing to children. The standards are similar but not as strict.

Scott Faber, lobbyist for the Grocery Manufacturers Association, says the industry has reformulated recipes to adhere to those standards as it has also limited marketing of the unhealthiest foods. He says the number of food ads on children's shows has fallen by half since 2004.

"The number of ads for cookies, candy, soda and snacks has dropped even more dramatically," he said.

As they have had to move away from marketing to kids, many food companies are stepping up efforts to reach the primary shoppers in family households, which are often moms. More ads are popping up on blogs directed at mothers and recipe sites.

The food industry's efforts to change recipes and limit advertising have come as consumers are increasingly educated and aware of what they are eating. The president's wife, Michelle Obama, also has been leading a campaign to fight childhood obesity.

Still, public health advocates say they believe a lot of work remains. Margo Wootan, director of nutrition policy at the advocacy group Center for Science in the Public Interest, says advocates hope the guidelines will make a greater impact.

"As a mom watching television with my daughter or walking through the aisles of the supermarket, it seems like nothing has changed," she says. "If companies applied these standards it would get rid of almost all junk food marketing to kids."


Copyright 2011 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

For more information about reprints & permissions, visit our FAQ's. To report corrections and clarifications, contact Standards Editor Brent Jones. For publication consideration in the newspaper, send comments to letters@usatoday.com. Include name, phone number, city and state for verification. To view our corrections, go to corrections.usatoday.com.We've updated the Conversation Guidelines. Changes include a brief review of the moderation process and an explanation on how to use the "Report Abuse" button. Read more.

USATODAY.com


This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

Thursday, April 14, 2011

Senators Propose Tighter Restrictions on Military Funeral Protests

Reuters

Nov. 11, 2010: Members of the Westboro Baptist Church hold anti-gay signs at Arlington National Cemetery in Virginia on Veterans Day.

A bipartisan group of senators on Thursday introduced a bill to strengthen restrictions on protests at military funerals, in response to a Supreme Court ruling in favor of a Kansas church notorious for picketing troops' funerals. 

The Supreme Court last month ruled that the Westboro Baptist Church's widely despised protests count as protected speech under the Constitution. The new proposal aims not to challenge that decision, but tighten existing restrictions to give grieving families more privacy. 

"Those who fight and die in the service of our country deserve our highest respect. Their families have earned the right to bury their loved ones in peace. The SERVE Act strikes a balance between the sanctity of a funeral service and the right to free speech," Sen. Olympia Snowe, R-Maine, said in a statement. 

The SERVE Act stands for "The Sanctity of Eternal Rest for Veterans." The bill would increase the buffer zone around military funerals from 150 feet to 300 feet, and increase the buffer around routes to the funerals from 300 feet to 500 feet. 

It would also increase the amount of "quiet time" before and after services from one hour to two hours and increase penalties. 

The Westboro Baptist Church, though, has threatened to challenge statutes across the country that restrict picketing, in light of the Supreme Court decision. 

The Supreme Court ruled 8-1, with only Justice Samuel Alito dissenting, that the protests were protected speech. 

"Speech is powerful. It can stir people to action, move them to tears of both joy and sorrow, and -- as it did here -- inflict great pain," Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in his majority opinion. "On the facts before us, we cannot react to that pain by punishing the speaker. As a nation we have chosen a different course -- to protect even hurtful speech on public issues to ensure that we do not stifle public debate." 

Other co-sponsors on the military funerals bill were: Sens. Ben Cardin, D-Md.; Dan Coats, R-Ind.; Kent Conrad, D-N.D.; Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y.; John Hoeven, R-N.D.; Kay Bailey Hutchison, R-Texas; Mike Johanns, R-Neb.; Mark Kirk, R-Ill.; Mark Pryor, D-Ark.; Harry Reid, D-Nev.; Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va.; Marco Rubio, R-Fla.; and Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H.

Print Email Share Comments Recommend Tweet View ArticleLeave a CommentSort: NewestSort: Oldest Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus. You must login to comment.

View Article

View All Comments

Latest Politics VideosMore »



View the Original article

Sunday, April 10, 2011

White House: Obama to Propose New Plan to Reduce Long-Term Deficits

AP

President Obama is introduced by senior adviser David Plouffe before he speaks at a Democratic National Committee event in Washington March 16.

White House senior adviser David Plouffe said Sunday that President Obama plans to outline a new proposal for bringing down the federal deficit this week. 

The announcement comes shortly after the White House reached a deal with Congress to fund the government for the rest of the fiscal year, and ahead of two other spending battles. Republicans are pushing for trillions in additional spending cuts over the next decade as part of their 2012 budget proposal and are threatening to torpedo a vote to raise the debt ceiling unless their spending-cut demands are met. 

Plouffe, who served as Obama's campaign manager in 2008, told "Fox News Sunday" that Obama wants to take a "balanced approach" to these issues and will lay out his proposal this week. The Obama plan, a follow-up to an earlier White House budget outline, would effectively serve as a counterproposal to the 10-year plan unveiled last week by Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis. -- a plan that aims to reduce the deficit by $4.4 trillion in that period through spending cuts and entitlement reforms.  

"We have to use a scalpel, not a machete," Plouffe cautioned, while vowing to look at "all corners of government" for savings. "We're going to have a big debate."

Plouffe said the president's plan would address Medicare and Medicaid, though he said Obama would downplay Social Security as a minor contributor to the country's short-term deficits. He said the president would continue to push for rolling back the Bush tax cuts for wealthy Americans. 

"His budget for this year says for upper-income Americans, he does believe that they need to contribute to the deficit reduction in this country," he said. 

The White House said in a Twitter post that the president would deliver his opening speech on the plan Wednesday. 

Plouffe, in the interview, criticized Ryan's plan for making cuts to education and energy investment while giving tax breaks for the wealthy. But Plouffe made clear that the White House is outlining its new deficit reduction plan with an eye toward the upcoming debt ceiling vote. 

"We're not going to default on the debt limit. We can't do that," Plouffe said, warning that such a move would hurt job creation and lead to increased interest rates. He said the White House wants to make clear that deficit reduction is possible, suggesting lawmakers on both sides of the aisle should back an increase in the debt ceiling while working toward long-term deficit reduction. 

"We don't disagree that we cannot continue on this fiscal path," he said. Plouffe said that, as the latest budget deal proves, "compromise is not a dirty word."  

But House Republican Leader Eric Cantor, R-Va., questioned whether Obama had found religion on spending cuts. Though Republicans and Democrats just reached a deal to cut $38.5 billion out of the budget for the rest of the current fiscal year, Cantor said the White House wasn't exactly cooperative. 

"We've had to bring this president kicking and screaming to the table to cut spending," Cantor told "Fox News Sunday. "It's really hard to believe what this White House and what this president is saying." 

He said Republicans will still need to see genuine spending cuts and entitlement reforms to go along with an increase in the $14.3 trillion debt ceiling. 

Earlier in the year, Obama proposed a 10-year budget plan that forecast $1.1 trillion in deficit reduction. But Republicans derided the proposal, noting that the president was looking to freeze discretionary spending at already-high levels and that the national debt would continue to soar under his plan. 

Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., top Republican on the Senate Budget Committee, said Sunday that he hopes the next proposal will be "sincere." 

"I think he needs to do more than just give a speech," he told Fox News. "I think he needs to submit a new budget." 

Cantor said Sunday that the weekend's budget deal was "only the beginning" in the battle to control spending. 

"We have a fiscal train wreck before us," he said. "This is the first bite of the apple." 

Print Email Share Comments Recommend Tweet View ArticleLeave a CommentSort: NewestSort: Oldest Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus. You must login to comment.

View Article

View All Comments

Latest Politics VideosMore »



View the Original article

Sunday, April 3, 2011

House GOP budget to propose major Medicare change

PreviousPeanuts vs. popcorn riding on Butler vs. VCU

NextSenators play down talk of government shutdown

To report corrections and clarifications, contact Standards Editor Brent Jones. For publication consideration in the newspaper, send comments to letters

View the Original article