Ads 468x60px


Showing posts with label labour. Show all posts
Showing posts with label labour. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 15, 2011

Labour Minister eyes forcing an end to postal strike (Reuters)

OTTAWA (Reuters) – Canada Post locked out all its employees on Wednesday, saying more than a week of rotating strikes by unionized letter carriers and other postal workers had cost it too much money.

The move immediately caught the attention of Labour Minister Lisa Raitt, who is preparing legislation to end a strike at Air Canada and is now consulting cabinet colleagues on whether to do the same with Canada Post.

"We have all kinds of options, and everybody knows what those options are according to the Canada Labour Code," Raitt told reporters.

Canada Post and the workers are engaged in a contract dispute complicated by questions over how the postal system can survive in a era when letter writers use email and bills are delivered and paid via the Internet.

Key discussion points are pensions and wages as well as health and safety issues.

Raitt defended the decision not to introduce Canada Post legislation so far, saying that the union's rotating 24-hour strikes had not shut down the postal system, but the lockout had now done so.

"We've had...rolling strikes, and we really haven't heard a lot of public outcry. It's different from 1997, when we saw a lot of people concerned about a general mail strike. Now we have email, we have package services," she said.

Contrasting the current situation with the initial rolling strike, she said: "This is different. This is now a lockout... We're going to go back and take a look at the parameters."

Canadian Union of Postal Workers (CUPW) President Denis Lemelin told an Ottawa news conference that back-to-work legislation would be unfair.

"Free bargaining is important. It's the only way that the parties can achieve something."

CUPW launched a series of 24-hour strikes 12 days ago, rotating among different communities across the country. Canada Post says the job action has already cost it C$100 million ($103 million).

"The accelerating decline in volumes and revenue combined with the inability to deliver mail on a timely and safe basis has left the company with no choice but to make this decision," the federal corporation said in a statement.

The leader of about 15 postal workers picketing outside a Toronto post office said the union had been trying to be fair by not launching a nation-wide strike, but said Canada Post was trying to prompt the threat of legislation.

"They want us to be legislated back so that we don't get a fair deal on our contract. That's why they're doing what they're doing -- they're blackballing themselves," said Pamela Lepine, union captain at the post office.

Propped against the building were signs reading: "Tyrant bosses locked us out", and "Locked out by mindless greedy tyrants". Streetcar drivers honked as they passed by.

Canada Post, which is owned by the federal government but operates independently as a for-profit company, had already cut mail delivery in urban areas to three days a week in response the labor action.

Canada Post has offered raises to existing employees, but has said its survival depends on it being able to impose a lower wage scale on workers hired in the future so that it can compete better with other delivery companies, which have lower cost structures.

The union says the company is profitable, but refuses to listen to CUPW's proposals to deal with increasing competition by providing nontraditional services such as banking at post offices.

Canada Post has also said it needs changes in its pension plan because it is currently running a C$3.2 billion deficit, but the union says that figure is exaggerated.

Queen's University labor relations expert George Smith said the lockout was expected.

"The only surprise with this move by management is that it took this long," he said. "The union declared a strike at the beginning of June and slowly escalated it over the days. Canada Post management tolerated it for a while in hopes a settlement could be reached without a full-scale strike."

($1=$0.97 Canadian)

(Additional reporting by Allison Martell in Toronto and Allan Dowd in Vancouver; editing by Rob Wilson and Peter Galloway)


Yahoo! News

Child labour and youth unemployment pose dilemmas (OneWorld.net)

LONDON, June 13 (OneWorld.net) - As global youth unemployment hits record levels, adolescents are increasingly presented with a choice between undertaking hazardous work or no work at all.

Children in hazardous work, a report published by the International Labour Organization to coincide with yesterday's World Day Against Child Labour, finds that 62 million youths aged 15-17 years were engaged in hazardous occupations during 2008. This figure represents about half of all employment undertaken by this age group.

Furthermore, this proportion of unacceptable work is rising sharply, up 20% since 2004. The ILO also warns that recent years of economic recession may have exerted further downward pressure on conditions experienced by young workers.

Produced by the ILO's International Programme on the Elimination of Child Labour, the report draws evidence from a range of sectors, including agriculture, fishing, construction and mining, the latter regarded as posing the greatest risks. It observes that hazardous child labour is not confined to developing countries.

The biological metabolism of growing adolescents increases their vulnerability. For example, young people absorb toxic pollutants into their bloodstream at a greater rate than adults. They also need more sleep, rendering long working hours or night shifts a risk to normal development.

Permanent damage to health is acknowledged by international law to be an unacceptable price for finding a job. The 1999 ILO Convention 182 for the Elimination of the Worst Forms of Child Labour, of which hazardous work is part, commits countries to make plans for achieving this goal by 2016.

Including children aged under 15 years, the numbers in hazardous occupations in 2008 totalled 115 million. The Convention has been ratified by 173 out of 183 ILO member countries and the new report aims to revive the necessary sense of urgency amongst them.

On the day before Children in hazardous work was released, the ILO's annual conference in Geneva conducted a high level debate on "Global Youth: Leading Change." The focus was on 81 million in the 15-24 age group who are unemployed, the highest level ever recorded.

ILO Director-General, Juan Somavia, was scathing on claims by economists that a global recovery is under way. "There is no recovery if we lose a generation of young people," he said. "It is an inefficient model of growth where young people are being squeezed out."

By inviting a special panel of young speakers from Arab countries currently embroiled in constitutional upheaval, the conference made a pointed connection between youth unemployment and political protest.

In his report marking the 100th annual session of the International Labour Conference, Somavia writes: "youth unemployment is highest in the very regions where social unrest has recently erupted. It would be hard to consider this to be a coincidence."

In proposing solutions to these closely related problems - the search for work by young people, and the conditions of work for those successful in finding it - the ILO adopts very different philosophies.

Children in hazardous work positions adolescent workers as passive victims of misfortune, in need of protection and support from governments, employers and their communities, responding to the paternal directive of Convention 182.

By contrast, the zeitgeist tone of the conference envisaged young people as masters of their own destiny, provoked by exclusion from global economic progress into dissent. High youth unemployment "demands a new era of peaceful social and popular mobilization that can project the voice and demands of people into the heart of political decision-making," Somavia asserts in his report.

The authors of Children in hazardous work acknowledge the awkward dilemma between "those promoting work (youth employment programmes) and those trying to end it (child labour programmes)."

A repeated reflection at the ILO conference was that "older children have become the problem area."

* More Information:

World Day Against Child Labour 2011

OneWorld Child Labour Guide


Yahoo! News