Ads 468x60px


Showing posts with label Terror. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Terror. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 29, 2011

AP IMPACT: Questions arise over FBI terror profile (AP)

LONDON – The FBI's most-wanted list features a dated black-and-white photograph for the man wanted in connection with the 1998 U.S. embassy bombings in Tanzania and Kenya. Saif al-Adel, reads the glaring red banner, alias Muhammad Ibrahim Makkawi.

But intelligence officials and people who say they know al-Adel and Makkawi tell The Associated Press that they are two different men.

In the wake of Osama bin Laden's death, AP reporters around the globe began hunting for fresh details on al-Adel — al-Qaida's so-called third man because of his strategic military experience. Traversing a reporting trail that spanned from Europe to Egypt and from Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iran, a new picture started to emerge about the al-Adel investigation: that the FBI's manhunt dragged in the name of a one-time jihadist turned vocal al-Qaida critic who now can't get his name off the wanted list.

Intelligence officials from five countries and a handful of sources who say they knew the men personally over the years confirmed to the AP that al-Adel and Makkawi were two distinct people. Some of those sources came forward with two photographs that show two different men.

"That is certainly not Makkawi," Montasser el-Zayat, a lawyer who represented Makkawi in Egypt, told the AP after looking at the FBI's photo of al-Adel.

In emails seen by the AP, a man who identifies himself as Makkawi says he has tried several times to clear his name but to no avail.

In response to several questions, the FBI declined specific comment last week on whether it was possible the information it had been using was bad or dated. However, on Wednesday the FBI defended its characterization of al-Adel.

"It is fair to say that a.k.a.'s/alias known to the FBI and used by subjects listed on our Most Wanted site or for that matter for any individual being sought by law enforcement, can also be the names of true individuals," said FBI spokeswoman Kathleen R. Wright.

She said the FBI was confident the man on the poster was al-Adel, but offered no immediate redress for Makkawi over the possible use of his name on the poster.

"The distinction in this case is such that we have a photo and other identifiers that distinguish one individual from another," Wright said in an email.

She said al-Adel, like other suspects on the 'most wanted' list, was indicted by a U.S. grand jury. However, the original documents in al-Adel's case remain sealed, making it all but impossible for the public to see where the FBI obtained its original evidence or the basic details about al-Adel's identity.

The description of al-Adel highlights the questionable intelligence that often goes into profiles of top suspects by the world's intelligence services.

Many of the profiles are based on information obtained from captives under duress or worse. Some bits come from unreliable sources. Other tips are never verified.

On the surface, some may ask why the world should care — one man is a jihadist with a $5 million bounty on his head; the other a former jihadist turned al-Qaida critic. But the case raises a number of important questions about the accuracy of FBI profiles and how stale or misleading intelligence could hamper searches. Even with fairly good leads, it took U.S. authorities more than a decade to find bin Laden.

Al-Adel's profile, for example, was posted in October 2001 when the FBI "Most Wanted Terrorist" list was created — just a month after the Sept. 11 terror attacks. Although some of the descriptive details may be old, the FBI says the details are still accurate and relevant.

"We have no information there have been any significant errors regarding the individuals in which we are seeking the public's assistance in locating," the FBI said.

Yet since 9/11, dozens of people have been wrongly mistaken for suspected terrorists because of faulty or spotty intelligence.

A German man snatched by the CIA in Macedonia and tortured at a secret prison in Afghanistan is suing Macedonia for his ordeal after U.S. courts rejected his case on the grounds that it could reveal government secrets. The man says he was kidnapped from Macedonia in 2003, apparently mistaken for a terror suspect.

A Canadian engineer who was also caught up in the U.S. government's secret transfer of terror suspects to ghost sites was deported to Syria when he was mistaken for a terrorist as he changed planes in New York on his way home. The Supreme Court refused to hear his case against top Bush administration officials.

"You are going to have good intelligence and bad intelligence, but the problem is when that bad intelligence is used to charge and detain people or to build cases against others," said Ben Wizner, the American Civil Liberties Union attorney representing Khaled el-Masri, the German who was sent to a secret prison and, according to Wizner, has suffered because of the trauma. "This faulty intelligence and disregard for the legal process has damaged and disrupted the lives of innocent people."

It is unclear exactly how Makkawi's life has been affected. The former Egyptian army officer who worked in a counterterrorism unit has yet to come forward and did not respond to several emails sent by the AP.

Still, in May a man who identified himself as Makkawi sent a handful of emails to journalists and commentators, saying he had been mistaken for al-Adel. In one email to the pan-Arab newspaper Asharq Al-Awsat, which publishes an English edition in London, he claimed he was a colonel in the Egyptian army, has long been an opponent of al-Qaida and other jihadist groups and has been mistaken for al-Adel ever since settling down in Pakistan.

He says he and his family have been branded enemies of both the United States and al-Qaida — an unenviable position.

In an earlier message to the newspaper in July 2010, the same man criticized al-Qaida and Pakistan: "There is an immoral extortion campaign against the U.S. and its allies and the Islamic movement being led by Pakistan, for its own motives. Pakistan has all of these international terrorists in its hands."

Pakistani authorities have said they have no knowledge of Makkawi's whereabouts.

In a third email sent to a London commentator and seen by the AP, the man said he and his family had survived multiple assassination attempts in Pakistan. He also says he appealed to officials in the Bush administration to clear his name, but without success.

The email is full with basic biographical data — the man says he graduated from the Egyptian Military Academy in 1972, refused to participate in a war against Libya in 1977 and claims he was eventually viewed as a traitor by Egyptian authorities.

It is easy enough to understand how the FBI might have thought Makkawi was simply an alias for al-Adel.

A tip may have come from a detainee at the U.S. prison camp in Guantanamo Bay, who told investigators he met with a "Muhammad Ibrahim Makkawi, aka (al-Adel)," according to secret documents released by WikiLeaks. Others who say they know both men say al-Adel might intentionally be using Makkawi's name as revenge for Makkawi's pointed criticism of al-Qaida and other jihadist groups.

But photographs provided to the AP by people who say they knew both al-Adel and Makkawi show two different men. The FBI's photo of al-Adel shows a slender man with thin hair, full lips and delicate features; a picture of Makkawi — which does not appear on the FBI poster — shows a stout man with a round face, bulbous nose and thick, curly hair.

Noman Benotman, a former jihadist with links to al-Qaida and now an analyst at the London-based Quilliam Foundation, says he has met both al-Adel and Makkawi.

Describing Makkawi as "well-educated, short-fused and unpredictable," Benotman said the last time he saw Makkawi was in Jalalabad, Afghanistan, around 1994.

Benotman said the last time he saw al-Adel was in 2000 in Kandahar, Afghanistan. He said he was impressed with his knowledge of military strategy and country profiles.

"The big difference between them is that Makkawi hates al-Qaida, hates these jihadist groups, and in particular hates the Egyptian jihadist groups where Zawahiri came from," said Benotman, referring to the Egyptian eye doctor who has succeeded bin Laden as head of the terror network.

Both al-Adel and Makkawi are Egyptian, reportedly served in the Egyptian army and were accused of links to jihadist groups.

But Makkawi reportedly severed all ties with extremist groups after growing disillusioned with their goals and strategies.

Specializing in counterterrorism operations, Makkawi was one of several army officers accused in 1987 of forming a jihadist group. Although he was released without charge after six months in jail, he was sacked from his army job and struggled to find consistent work afterward. In 1988, he reportedly sued the Egyptian interior ministry and demanded compensation. When the suit failed, he went to see family in Saudi Arabia, then went to Afghanistan, and eventually settled in Pakistan.

Two British officials, who spoke to AP on condition of anonymity because they aren't authorized to discuss intelligence matters, confirmed that Makkawi is a different man from al-Adel and said he is not wanted as a terror suspect by the British government. Britain has no such public "most wanted" terrorist list.

"Makkawi is a different man to el-Adel," one of the officials said.

El-Zayat, Makkawi's lawyer in the 1987 case, also told the AP the men were two different people and that al-Adel's real name is Mohammed Salah Zidan.

There is no mention of the name "Mohammed Salah Zidan" on al-Adel's profile.

Yasser el-Siri, founder of the Islamic Marsad Center in London — a research center for Islamic and jihadist affairs — said he met Makkawi in the Saudi Arabian city of Mecca between 1989 and 1990.

He also offered some key differences in the men's lives.

Al-Adel was born in the 1960s, is tall, comes from the Nile Delta and married the daughter of a well-known Egyptian journalist-turned-jihadist, Abouel Walid, who was editor-in-chief of The Islamic Emirate magazine, an extremist publication, el-Siri said. The editor was one of an early generation of jihadists who fought against the Soviets in Afghanistan. Western intelligence officials believe al-Adel is living in Iran but travels frequently to Pakistan and Afghanistan. He was a reservist in the Egyptian army.

Makkawi, who was born in the 1950s, also comes from the Nile Delta but had a Saudi father and Egyptian mother. He graduated from military college in 1972, became a lieutenant and then joined the special forces. He is reportedly short compared al-Adel.

Makkawi joined jihadist groups in Afghanistan but then criticized them for their poor tactics and planning, describing their battles as "the war of the goats."

It is unclear when al-Adel formally joined al-Qaida or an affiliate, but he is thought to be one of the group's most experienced military strategists. Prior to the U.S. Embassy bombings, he allegedly had a hand in operations against U.S. forces who entered Somalia in 1993 in an attempt to capture Somali warlord Mohamed Farrah Aidid and some of his top lieutenants. In the end, 18 U.S. troops died in the operation.

On the surface, the truth is still unclear.

The shadowy world of intelligence has long been built on knowns and unknowns, truths and half-truths and spider webs of good, bad and old information that can take years before it is investigated, if at all. New leads often eclipse old information even as that old data lives on.

"Intelligence is a business like anything else," Bob Ayers, a former U.S. intelligence officer, told the AP.

"When the Sept. 11 terror attacks hit, the intelligence community wasn't prepared. It scurried around and it tried to make do. Old leads should and could be followed up if there were enough resources, but it's unlikely you're going to shut your best analysts in a dark room for months just so they can investigate information that is sometimes 10 years old."

Richard Barrett, a U.N. representative responsible for monitoring al-Qaida and the Taliban, also confirmed to the AP that the FBI mistakenly identified al-Adel as Makkawi and — importantly — neglected to say on his profile that al-Adel's real name, according to people in the intelligence community, is thought to be Mohammed Salah Zidan.

"We have no information that Makkawi is one of the aliases that Saif is using, so it's a question-mark why that name is on the FBI list," said another European security official speaking on condition of anonymity because he wasn't authorized to talk publicly about the issue.

Officials at Egypt's newly established National Security apparatus, which is now the gatekeeper of all documents and records related to the Islamic jihadists, declined to provide any details or information about al-Adel or Makkawi.

The new body is replacing Egypt's State Security apparatus, which was dissolved after the toppling of Hosni Mubarak.

Social networking sites, meanwhile, were bubbling with people claiming to be the real Saif al-Adel. None has claimed to be the real Makkawi yet.

Although the FBI says it has only listed Makkawi as one of al-Adel's aliases — not necessarily mistaken him for al-Adel — it is not entirely clear how someone gets off the FBI's 'most wanted' list, even if the name is just the alias, not the face, on the poster.

"The individuals listed on the FBI Most Wanted Terrorist page will remain wanted in connection with their alleged crimes until such time as they have been arrested, charges are dropped or when credible physical evidence is obtained, which proves with 100 percent accuracy, that they are deceased," the FBI said.

___

Contributing to this report were Maggie Michael from Cairo, Kathy Gannon from Islamabad and Karl Ritter from Stockholm.


Yahoo! News

Monday, June 20, 2011

Sudan: From the Nuba Mountains, Tales of Terror Bleed Out (Time.com)

More than once, the world has pledged never again: after the Holocaust in World War II, after Rwanda in 1994, then Bosnia in 1995, and most recently after the slaughter in Darfur. So it is no surprise that when reports of alleged ethnic cleansing begin bleeding out, Western policymakers start to squirm. This raw nerve was on exhibit once again this past week, when on Wednesday President Obama devoted a special two-minute radio address to an obscure renewed conflict in the remote mountains of central Sudan. But if the reported atrocities escalate, will words be all the world can offer?

Sudan's history is strewn with cases of mass atrocities against non-Arabs in the south and north, with Darfur being only the latest; reports in recent weeks from Sudan's South Kordofan state suggest history could be repeating itself yet again. There, members of a minority, opposition-aligned African ethnic group are being slaughtered "like animals," in the words of one alarming church statement. The diverse tribes live in a rugged land of mud-hut villages called the Nuba Mountains. So far, besides an aerial-bombardment campaign against the Nuba areas, the targeted killings against them have been mostly confined to the major towns, as tens of thousands flee into the hills where, for now, they are mostly safe. (See pictures of southern Sudan going to the polls.)

But internal U.N. documents obtained by TIME show that refuge might soon come under attack too. Hundreds of military vehicles have streamed into South Kordofan's capital Kadugli, the epicenter of the bloodbath, according to U.N. reports. Preparations for a major ground offensive were becoming increasingly clear, the U.N. Kadugli base warned in a June 15 confidential dispatch, which urgently called for political intervention to ward off the crisis.

Since fighting started two weeks ago, the Sudanese government under Omar al-Bashir has done its best to isolate the already remote region to keep information from flowing out and humanitarian assistance from flowing in. But aid workers working in the affected area who recently escaped to Juba, capital of South Sudan - set to declare formal independence in July under a cloud of conflict - tell TIME of a land under a spell of impending doom. "You can see it in all their eyes. They are scared. They see this as a fight for survival," said one in an interview in Juba. The children and women pouring in from Kadugli and other towns wear signs of deep trauma and hunger, say aid workers, and tell stories of Arab militias killing anyone who is black. "The government thinks that all black people are opposition supporters, and are therefore targets even if they are children or old grannies," explained one aid worker who had just left the area. One visibly disturbed Nuba aid worker who had fled with his family from Kadugli said the pro-government forces were acting as if under an order to clear out the whole Nuba population.

It is a brutal but old counterinsurgency tactic - draining the pond, to use an old adage - and the Sudanese government has used it numerous times before. The aid workers interviewed predicted that if the ground offensive commences, "absolute carnage," in the words of one, could ensue. None of the aid workers wished for their names or organizations to be mentioned for security reasons.

Their accounts align with official statements from church and domestic and international advocacy groups, based on reports they are gathering from the ground. The Anglican Church's Archbishop of Canterbury warned last week: "The risk of another Darfur ... is a real one," and both church and advocacy groups are already using the word "ethnic cleansing." While death tolls are impossible to calculate, there seems to be agreement that the number is at least in the "hundreds." The U.N. estimates that at least 60,000 have been displaced. But the real fear is over what could be yet to come.

The tepid response from the international community so far is being met with frustration, though not surprise. The U.N. receives especially scathing criticism. Its peacekeeping presence has been confined to its Kadugli base, where it is trying to protect up to 8,500 who have camped there in hopes of finding safety. Egyptian peacekeepers, seen as biased toward Sudan's Arab government, are accused by many Nuba of being complicit in targeted assassinations within the U.N. displaced camp, a charge that cannot be independently confirmed. Whether true or not, distrust against the Egyptians among the displaced population was so high that Bangladeshi troops were flown in to guard the camp instead. (See pictures of southern Sudan readying for a referendum.)

As for the U.S., Obama's stern appeal to end the fighting has had no discernible effect on the ground. The U.S. special envoy to Sudan, Princeton Lyman, told TIME that the U.S. was working extremely hard to get a cease-fire - including via a direct meeting with Nuba rebel leader Abdelaziz al-Hilu at his South Kordofan base this past week - but said the Administration was not currently looking at any intervention plans in case the situation escalated. Due to already heavy sanctions, the U.S. has little soft leverage besides incentives - a normalization of ties, delisting Sudan as a sponsor of terror, and approving the nation's access to international financing and debt relief. Lyman said these were what Sudan ultimately needed: "Their future depends on coming back to the international community."

But prospects of a cease-fire appear slim. Al-Hilu has agreed to negotiate, but only for a lasting political solution that includes power sharing and an arrangement for the tens of thousands of his rebel fighters left over from the civil war. It is still not clear whether the government in Khartoum is even willing to talk. As for the Nuba, this seems like just another chapter in a familiar history. In the early 1900s, Winston Churchill, then a young British soldier on a military campaign in Sudan, described how a fierce Sudanese battalion was sent down to fight the Nuba, a "mountain people who cared for nothing but their independence," just to give the elite soldiers something to do. In the 1990s, as many as half a million Nuba were killed as the Sudanese government declared jihad against them. When I was in the Nuba Mountains in April, I found a people terrified that war would return but resigned to their frightful and uncertain future. Given their history and the history of their government, they seem to have good reasons to fear.

See "In Sudan's Nuba Mountains, on the Edge of War."

Watch "Blind but Empowered: Voting for a Sovereign Southern Sudan."

View this article on Time.com

Most Popular on Time.com:


Yahoo! News

Thursday, June 16, 2011

Jihadi forum suggests terror targets

U.S.-born al Qaeda propagandist Adam Gadahn encouraged acts of individual jihad in a June 3 video, the FBI says.FBI says list appears aspirational in natureIt contains the names of more than 40 people and photos of 26A law enforcement official told CNN there is no indication a specific plot exists

Washington (CNN) -- A potential hit list suggesting individuals in U.S. government, industry and the media was posted on jihadi Web forums, according to an FBI intelligence bulletin obtained by CNN.

The FBI document was dated June 8 and says "while the information posted was detailed, it appears aspirational in nature and it is unknown whether the threat will progress beyond discussion" on the Internet.

The bulletin says forum members posted the names of more than 40 people and included photographs for 26 of the suggested targets. The FBI noted there has been an uptick in postings on jihadi sites since Osama bin Laden's death during a U.S. military raid but said this list has "the most target specific threat postings" since his demise.

The FBI said the list was spurred by a June 3 video featuring American-born al Qaeda propagandist Adam Gadahn "in which he encourages acts of individual jihad." The first Web post made note of Gadahn's call for assassinations. That led other forum members to start suggesting possible targets.

The man now at the helm of al Qaeda | Video

The web posts include the suggestion to collect photographs as well as home and work addresses for the people on the possible target list. The bulletin says the the list includes target suggestions ranging from U.S.-based think tanks to military contractors.

Al Qaeda has used the English-speaking Gadahn in numerous videos.

The FBI document notes that in one from March 2010 Gadahn "called for small attacks in the United States, but failed to have any observable resonance within the online extremist community." But the bulletin warns bin Laden's death may cause those who share his ideology to be more receptive.

A law enforcement official told CNN there is no indication a specific plot exists.

The official did not know if all the individuals on the list of possible targets had been briefed by law enforcement or whether they had been given any recommendations to protect their safety.

The FBI bulletins are intended for use by law enforcement and homeland security officials.

CNN Homeland Security Correspondent Jeanne Meserve contributed to this report


CNN

Friday, May 6, 2011

Coroner: 7/7 terror victims 'unlawfully killed'

Inquest into London terror attacksvar cnnWindowParams = window.location.toString().toQueryParams();if(typeof cnnWindowParams.video != "undefined") {if(cnnWindowParams.video) {cnnLoadStoryPlayer('world/2011/05/05/uk.terror.inquest.cnn', 'cnnCVP1', '640x384_start_art', playerOverRide, T1);}} else {$('cnnCVP2').onclick = function() {if ($$('.box-opened').length) {$$('.box-opened').each(function(val){Element.fireEvent(val, 'click');});}cnnLoadStoryPlayer('world/2011/05/05/uk.terror.inquest.cnn', 'cnnCVP1', '640x384_start_art', playerOverRide, T1);};$('cnnCVP2').onmouseover = function() {$('cnnCVP2').className = 'cnn_mtt1plybttn cnn_mtt1plybttnon';};$('cnnCVP2').onmouseout = function() {$('cnnCVP2').className = 'cnn_mtt1plybttn';};}Coroner expected to recommend some change to emergency response procedures
Inquest heard two of the bombers identified before the attack in separate investigation
But security service rejected any suggestion of intelligence failings
52 people died in four bombs on July 7, 2005 -- three on underground trains, one on a bus

London (CNN) -- A British coroner has ruled that 52 people who died in a string of bomb attacks on London's transport system on July 7, 2005 were unlawfully killed.

Following a six month inquest into the deaths on three tube trains and a bus, coroner Justice Heather Hallett paid tribute to the blast survivors, rescue workers, and the families of the dead.

After reading out the names of all the victims, Hallett told the court that it was important to recognise that each of them would have died, no matter what time emergency services workers reached them.

One of the key questions of Hallett's inquiry was whether any of the deaths were caused by any delayed reactions of emergency services, due to fears of secondary explosions or over-regulated safety guidelines.

As well as stories of great courage and great fortitude, the inquest heard reports of police officers apparently reluctant to board the wrecked bus on Tavistock Square in central London as badly injured people screamed for help.

There were similar stories of firemen unwilling to enter an underground tunnel until certain it was safe to do so.

Some recommendations from the coroner about the rigidity of procedures by the emergency services are likely, but sweeping criticism is not expected, according to one analyst.

"It's very easy to say in retrospect that people held back and therefore they were cowards," said Jennifer Cole, from think tank the Royal United Services Institute.

"In different situations they might have gone forward into the path of a secondary device and probably would have been martyred heroes but they would have been dead. In the grand scheme of things it's much better that they hold back than go forward and put themselves in danger."

The inquest heard from 300 witnesses, including those caught in the explosions, London Underground staff, police and emergency personnel.

But perhaps the most significant witness was a senior figure from the security service MI5, who was asked to account for how it was that two of the four bombers -- three British males of Pakistani descent and a Jamaican-born man -- were photographed as part of a separate terror investigation, but not followed up.

Witness G, as he was known, expressed regret that MI5 had missed the significance of Mohammed Siddique Khan and Shehzad Tanweer, but rejected any suggestion of intelligence failings.

Among the bereaved who took part in the inquest was John Taylor, whose 24-year-old daughter Carrie died on a train approaching Aldgate tube station.

Unhappy with previous explanations of exactly what happened on 7/7, Taylor decided to represent himself at the inquest, listening to harrowing details of his daughter's final moments, and putting questions directly to those who tried to save her life.

The questions he asked, he told CNN, came from the heart.

"The day Carrie came back to Billericay in a coffin I remember sitting in the chapel with [my wife] June and my son Simon and making a promise to Carrie to find out as much as I possibly could," Taylor told CNN.

CNN's Pete Wilkinson, Andrew Carey and Bryony Jones contributed to this report.


CNN Top Stories


This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

Monday, May 2, 2011

Bills would transfer oversight of terror cases

WASHINGTON — In the Justice Department's ornate Great Hall, a space traditionally reserved for its most important functions, Attorney General Eric Holder stepped before staffers last week to mark the department's accomplishments in the first two years of the Obama administration and the challenges to be confronted in the term's second half.



Attorney General Eric Holder says the U.S. will continue to rely on the federal court system to bring terror suspects to justice.

By Paul J. Richards, Getty Images, AFP


Attorney General Eric Holder says the U.S. will continue to rely on the federal court system to bring terror suspects to justice.

Perhaps most striking about the speech ? which reaffirmed the department's commitment to national security ? were words that Holder did not utter: Guantanamo Bay.

Just weeks after the administration capitulated on its promise to shut down the prison at Guantanamo and referred the suspects there to trials by military commissions ? not civilian courts ? Holder's address was partly an attempt to turn the page on a painful political loss.

Even so, the Guantanamo decision may mark just the first fight in a continuing battle to undermine his authority in terrorism prosecutions.

At least two bills before Congress threaten to transfer much of the investigative oversight in terrorism cases, which are currently Holder's responsibility as the attorney general, to the Defense secretary.

'A paradigm shift'

A bill in the House of Representatives, sponsored by Rep. Bobby Shilling, R-Ill., would require terrorism suspects, including those arrested in the United States, to be placed in military custody unless the Defense secretary rules otherwise.

"It acknowledges that the attorney general has played a too important role in these cases," said Josh Holly, a Republican spokesman for the House Armed Services Committee. "This represents a paradigm shift to the law of war."

A Senate bill, sponsored by Arizona's John McCain and other Republicans, includes a similar provision that calls for "members of al-Qaeda, the Taliban and affiliated terrorist groups" to be held by the military when captured.

The bill also would give authority to the Defense secretary ? not the attorney general ? to determine whether the suspect should be transferred to civilian custody.

"This much-needed legislation would improve our current ad hoc military detention system for members of al-Qaeda and their affiliated terrorist groups," McCain said when introducing the bill.

The proposed legislative provisions were inspired partly by the controversy that followed the arrest of Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, charged with trying to blow up a commercial airliner over Detroit with a bomb hidden in his underwear on Christmas Day 2009.

At that time, some lawmakers, including Sen. Joseph Lieberman, I-Conn., a co-sponsor of the current Senate bill, assailed Obama administration officials for the decision to inform Abdulmutallab of his right to a lawyer during a break in the interrogation.

Lieberman and others have argued that the Nigerian terrorism suspect should have been turned over to military authorities for interrogation rather than risk losing the suspect's cooperation on the advice of a defense lawyer.

"These are lessons learned from (Abdulmutallab)," Holly said.

In his speech to staffers, Holder, while not referring to the Guantanamo decision, vowed to press federal law enforcement's anti-terrorism efforts.

"Let me be very clear about this: We will continue to rely on our most powerful and most proven tool in bringing terrorists to justice: our federal court system," Holder said.

Later, in a meeting with reporters, Holder said that the federal court system has demonstrated a "capacity" to prosecute terrorism cases.

Since the 9/11 attacks, there have been more than 400 convictions in terror and terror-related prosecutions, according to Justice Department records.

"We have the capacity to try terrorists in (federal) courts," Holder said.

A question of authority

Despite the federal courts' record of dealing with terrorism cases, some advocates for civilian prosecutions said, the Guantanamo decision diminishes the Justice Department's standing in terror prosecutions.

"The flip-flop by the Obama administration makes the Justice Department look symbolically weaker," said Hina Shamsi, director of the ACLU's National Security Project, "but we shouldn't let a decision based on politics diminish the role the department has played in successfully prosecuting hundreds of terror cases in federal court."

Dixon Osburn, law and security program director at Human Rights First, said the McCain and Shilling bills amount to the next challenge to the administration.

"I don't think anybody has really focused on these (bills) yet," Osburn said. "The White House needs to say that there are lines that cannot be crossed."

For more information about reprints & permissions, visit our FAQ's. To report corrections and clarifications, contact Standards Editor Brent Jones. For publication consideration in the newspaper, send comments to letters@usatoday.com. Include name, phone number, city and state for verification. To view our corrections, go to corrections.usatoday.com.We've updated the Conversation Guidelines. Changes include a brief review of the moderation process and an explanation on how to use the "Report Abuse" button. Read more.

USATODAY.com


This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

Clinton: Bin Laden's death doesn't end war on terror

WASHINGTON — Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said Monday that the U.S. message to al-Qaeda remains the same today, but it "might have even greater resonance" in the wake of Osama bin Laden's death.



Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton makes a statement regarding the death of Osama bin Laden on Monday.

By Jacquelyn Martin, AP


Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton makes a statement regarding the death of Osama bin Laden on Monday.

"You cannot defeat us," Clinton said at the State Department, urging al-Qaeda members to renounce the terror organization and back U.S. efforts to stop violence against innocents. "The fight continues and we will never waver."

Clinton said bin Laden's death was a milestone in the war on terrorism, but stressed that the "battle to stop al-Qaeda and its syndicate of terror" is not over. Clinton said cooperation with Pakistan helped lead the U.S. to the compound where bin Laden was killed and the U.S. would continue to boost its counterterrorism cooperation with other nations, including Pakistan.

But John Brennan, White House advisor on Homeland Security, said at a press briefing Monday that it was inconceivable that bin Laden didn't have some kind of support in Pakistan.

"People are raising questions and understandably so," he said. "A number of people have questions on whether there was some kind of support by the Pakistani government."

The death of bin Laden, while celebrated in the U.S. and other countries that have been al-Qaeda's targets, is likely to set off a spasm of attacks aimed at re-establishing the terror organization's international credentials and avenging the killing of its longtime leader, security analysts said.

"Decapitation does not mean the end of the movement," said Georgetown University professor Bruce Hoffman, who has studied terrorism and insurgencies for more than three decades.

Hoffman said al-Qaeda's surviving franchises are likely to be joined by other aspiring groups jockeying to fill a leadership void left in the wake of bin Laden's death.

"Some may see this as an opportunity to steal the limelight," Hoffman said. "While the risk may go up, the good news is that in the rush to do something, some of these (attacks) may go off half-cocked" and allow U.S. officials to learn more about the surviving terror networks.

The head of the House Homeland Security Committee said Monday that the United States must temper victory with vigilance in the wake of bin Laden's assassination.

Rep. Pete King told NBC's Today show the al-Qaeda terrorist organization could "try to avenge this death" and said "we'll have to be on full alert."

The New York Republican predicted "a fight for power" within al-Qaeda. King also said there will be "round-the-clock" government surveillance to determine if al-Qaeda is planning or organizing a retaliatory attack. He said federal agencies will be trying to find out if an attack is possible or imminent, "and how we can prevent it, how we can stop it."

Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano said the government has no plans to raise the terror alert level in the U.S. as a result of bin Laden's death.

Napolitano said elevated terror alerts will only be issued when the government has specific or credible intelligence it can share with the American public.

Some communities around the country, including the New York City subway system, have increased security out of concerns of potential retaliation attacks. Napolitano said the country remains at a heightened state of vigilance, and the U.S. is safer than it was on Sept. 11, 2001 because bin Laden is dead.

Retaliatory attacks against the U.S. and Western targets could come from members of al-Qaeda's core branch in the tribal areas of Pakistan, al-Qaeda franchises in other countries, and radicalized individuals in the U.S. with al-Qaeda sympathies, according to a Homeland Security Department intelligence alert issued Sunday and obtained by the Associated Press.

Bin Laden was more of a symbol than anything else, said Qaribut Ustad Saeed, a longtime member of the Hezb-e-Islami rebel group led by Gulbuddin Hekmatyar, whom the U.S. has labeled a terrorist.

Saeed is currently a member of the Afghan High Peace Council set up to try to negotiate a peace settlement with the Taliban. Bin Laden's loss will be an inspirational one, rather than an operational one, he said.

"Osama bin Laden became a symbol and inspiration for the young Muslim extremists," he said. But the group has expanded into a worldwide movement that is now bigger than bin Laden, he said.

Family members of those killed in the World Trade Center attack were cautious Monday about the future.

"This is a good thing and it needed to happen. But it doesn't change everything," said Lynn Faulkner of Mason, Ohio, who lost his wife Wendy at the World Trade Center, where she was on business. "It's one battle in a war. He was a figurehead."

"It's not an end to anything," said Neda Bolourchi of Los Angeles, a Muslim whose mother Touri was a passenger on United Flight 175, which hijackers crashed into the World Trade Center. "His ideology is still rampant in the Arab world. But this is a dent. You wonder ? 'Is it really gonna make a difference?' Symbolically it does. … Justice was done."

"I've been waiting for this for 10 years," said Sheila Flocco of Wilmington, Del., whose only child -- 21-year-old Matthew -- was among those killed at the Pentagon when American Airlines Flight 77 slammed into it. "I know it's probably putting our country in danger again. Retaliation for his death could come and I'd hate to see that happen. But in the same breath, I'm glad they finally got him."

The State Department issued a worldwide advisory to U.S. citizens traveling and living abroad about the potential for anti-American violence in the wake of bin Laden's death.

"Given the uncertainty and volatility of the current situation, U.S. citizens in areas where recent events could cause anti-American violence are strongly urged to limit their travel outside of their homes and hotels and avoid mass gatherings and demonstrations," the advisory said.

U.S. government facilities worldwide remain at a heightened state of alert, the State Department said, and some may temporarily close or suspend public services when necessary.

Mark Lytle, Bard College historian and co-author of the American history textbook, Nation of Nations, called the killing of bin Laden "a shot in the arm for America's image," especially compared to the debacle that resulted when President Jimmy Carter mounted a similar effort to rescue American hostages in Iran in 1980.

"Americans can take a certain comfort that we were able to do this, especially in a period that's been pretty grim for the average citizen," he said Monday.

But for all the euphoria, Lytle said bin Laden's demise probably seems more important now than it will in retrospect.

"This is sweet revenge, but it won't change much," he said. "Sept. 11 will be remembered because so much changed."


Contributing: Johnson and David Jackson reported from Washington, D.C.; Hampson reported from New York; Carolyn Pesce in McLean, Va.; Tim Konski and Beth Miller, The (Wilmington, Del.) News-Journal; the Associated Press.

For more information about reprints & permissions, visit our FAQ's. To report corrections and clarifications, contact Standards Editor Brent Jones. For publication consideration in the newspaper, send comments to letters@usatoday.com. Include name, phone number, city and state for verification. To view our corrections, go to corrections.usatoday.com.We've updated the Conversation Guidelines. Changes include a brief review of the moderation process and an explanation on how to use the "Report Abuse" button. Read more.

USATODAY.com


This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

Bills would transfer oversight of terror cases

WASHINGTON — In the Justice Department's ornate Great Hall, a space traditionally reserved for its most important functions, Attorney General Eric Holder stepped before staffers last week to mark the department's accomplishments in the first two years of the Obama administration and the challenges to be confronted in the term's second half.

var data = blocks.columnist;if (data != undefined){document.getElementById('columnistmug').innerHTML=data;} By Paul J. Richards, Getty Images, AFP

Attorney General Eric Holder says the U.S. will continue to rely on the federal court system to bring terror suspects to justice.

By Paul J. Richards, Getty Images, AFP

Attorney General Eric Holder says the U.S. will continue to rely on the federal court system to bring terror suspects to justice.

Perhaps most striking about the speech ? which reaffirmed the department's commitment to national security ? were words that Holder did not utter: Guantanamo Bay.

Just weeks after the administration capitulated on its promise to shut down the prison at Guantanamo and referred the suspects there to trials by military commissions ? not civilian courts ? Holder's address was partly an attempt to turn the page on a painful political loss.

Even so, the Guantanamo decision may mark just the first fight in a continuing battle to undermine his authority in terrorism prosecutions.

At least two bills before Congress threaten to transfer much of the investigative oversight in terrorism cases, which are currently Holder's responsibility as the attorney general, to the Defense secretary.

'A paradigm shift'

A bill in the House of Representatives, sponsored by Rep. Bobby Shilling, R-Ill., would require terrorism suspects, including those arrested in the United States, to be placed in military custody unless the Defense secretary rules otherwise.

"It acknowledges that the attorney general has played a too important role in these cases," said Josh Holly, a Republican spokesman for the House Armed Services Committee. "This represents a paradigm shift to the law of war."

A Senate bill, sponsored by Arizona's John McCain and other Republicans, includes a similar provision that calls for "members of al-Qaeda, the Taliban and affiliated terrorist groups" to be held by the military when captured.

The bill also would give authority to the Defense secretary ? not the attorney general ? to determine whether the suspect should be transferred to civilian custody.

"This much-needed legislation would improve our current ad hoc military detention system for members of al-Qaeda and their affiliated terrorist groups," McCain said when introducing the bill.

The proposed legislative provisions were inspired partly by the controversy that followed the arrest of Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, charged with trying to blow up a commercial airliner over Detroit with a bomb hidden in his underwear on Christmas Day 2009.

At that time, some lawmakers, including Sen. Joseph Lieberman, I-Conn., a co-sponsor of the current Senate bill, assailed Obama administration officials for the decision to inform Abdulmutallab of his right to a lawyer during a break in the interrogation.

Lieberman and others have argued that the Nigerian terrorism suspect should have been turned over to military authorities for interrogation rather than risk losing the suspect's cooperation on the advice of a defense lawyer.

"These are lessons learned from (Abdulmutallab)," Holly said.

In his speech to staffers, Holder, while not referring to the Guantanamo decision, vowed to press federal law enforcement's anti-terrorism efforts.

"Let me be very clear about this: We will continue to rely on our most powerful and most proven tool in bringing terrorists to justice: our federal court system," Holder said.

Later, in a meeting with reporters, Holder said that the federal court system has demonstrated a "capacity" to prosecute terrorism cases.

Since the 9/11 attacks, there have been more than 400 convictions in terror and terror-related prosecutions, according to Justice Department records.

"We have the capacity to try terrorists in (federal) courts," Holder said.

A question of authority

Despite the federal courts' record of dealing with terrorism cases, some advocates for civilian prosecutions said, the Guantanamo decision diminishes the Justice Department's standing in terror prosecutions.

"The flip-flop by the Obama administration makes the Justice Department look symbolically weaker," said Hina Shamsi, director of the ACLU's National Security Project, "but we shouldn't let a decision based on politics diminish the role the department has played in successfully prosecuting hundreds of terror cases in federal court."

Dixon Osburn, law and security program director at Human Rights First, said the McCain and Shilling bills amount to the next challenge to the administration.

"I don't think anybody has really focused on these (bills) yet," Osburn said. "The White House needs to say that there are lines that cannot be crossed."

For more information about reprints & permissions, visit our FAQ's. To report corrections and clarifications, contact Standards Editor Brent Jones. For publication consideration in the newspaper, send comments to letters@usatoday.com. Include name, phone number, city and state for verification. To view our corrections, go to corrections.usatoday.com.We've updated the Conversation Guidelines. Changes include a brief review of the moderation process and an explanation on how to use the "Report Abuse" button. Read more.

USATODAY.com


This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

Wednesday, April 20, 2011

New Terror Alerts Will Be Specific and Short-Lived, Napolitano Says

Associated Press

Print Email Share Comments Recommend Tweet

Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano says the U.S. color-coded terror alert system will be replaced next week by two warnings -- elevated and imminent.

The new warnings could be conveyed to the public through Facebook and Twitter. Unlike the colors, the alerts will have expiration dates.

The past system described the threat in five colors, from green, low risk, to red, severe.

Napolitano says the threat picture in the U.S. is currently at an "elevated baseline," and future public warnings will hinge on specific and credible intelligence above and beyond that threshold.

She says the terror threat to the U.S. is at its highest since Sept. 11, 2001 because of the increasing number and types of international and homegrown threats. This does not mean there is a specific threat of an imminent attack.

Print Email Share Comments Recommend Tweet View ArticleLeave a CommentSort: NewestSort: Oldest Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus. You must login to comment.

View Article

View All Comments

Latest Politics VideosMore »



View the Original article